Tagged: Alan Lange

Hatchet job on Lt. Gov. Reeves and shoddy journalism

I admit to being surprised on July 7 when I first read the Clarion-Ledger story that all but accused Lt. Gov. Tate Reeves of putting political pressure on the Mississippi Department of Transportation regarded a road project on Lakeland Drive (Hwy 25) that involves the gated community where Reeves and his family live in Flowood. Mississippi Today soon piled on with its own story about the issue. In my opinion the Clarion-Ledger story was clearly shoddy journalism. I was even more surprised the byline on the story was that of Geoff Pender, political editor of the Clarion-Ledger. It was not long after I read Pender’s story when I received a comment about the story, from someone not in the Reeves camp, saying the Clarion-Ledger was “out to get” Reeves. If you want more balanced accounts and more accurate accounts of this very hot issue, I suggest reading the column below by Jim Prince, publisher of the Neshoba County Democrat and the following column by Alan Lange, owner and editor of Y’all Politics.

http://neshobademocrat.com/MobileContent/EDITORIAL/Editorial/Article/EDITORIAL-Hood-deep-fries-Tater-Tot/7/302/43614

 

http://yallpolitics.com/2018/07/31/internal-documents-show-mdot-execs-repeatedly-whitewashed-staff-assessment-of-safety-being-the-driver-behind-lakeland-frontage-road

 

And what about MDOT? I have known Central District Highway Commissioner Dick Hall  for many years. He is a good man, a good public servant and I have a lot of respect for him. However, during the recent Neshoba County Fair, I listened to Hall’s interview on the J.T. Show on Supertalk Radio. I later read reports of his speech at the Fair. Considering both the interview and speech, it would not surprise me if Hall received a thank you note from Democrat Attorney General Jim Hood.

Why is this type of shoddy journalism a problem, and even unfair? The original report in the Clarion-Ledger, was followed by the story in Mississippi Today. Naturally, the story by Pender was picked up by the Associated Press and published in other newspapers and broadcast media across the state. Attorney General Jim Hood said he would investigate the allegations of political pressure. Hood investigating in itself is a joke. But what if Hood’s investigation turns up no proof that Reeves, members of his staff or others applied political pressure? What if all the allegations prove false? Most people won’t remember the subsequent stories. People are quick to believe any allegation against a public official or politician. The damage has already been done.

Commissioners should MDOT executive director

And what about Melinda McGraft, executive director of MDOT? During the current controversy involving MDOT, press reports and Lt. Gov. Reeves, Hall praised McGraft as an outstanding professional engineer. I don’t doubt that for a minute. But McGraft is more than an engineer. She is executive director of MDOT. For her allegations of political pressure and comments to the press, Hall and the other two highway commissioners should have the balls to fire McGraft.

“Media is corrupt. It’s chosen a side.”

U.S. Rep. Devin Nunes, Republican of California and chairman of the House Select on Intelligence, recently said this in an interview with The Wall Street Journal: “Today’s media is corrupt. It’s chosen a side.” Of course, Congressman Nunes was talking about the national media. However, the same journalism plant is growing in Mississippi. A few years ago when Haley Barbour was governor of Mississippi, Barbour gave his usual speech before a huge crowd at MEC’s annual Hobnob event. During his speech Barbour commented about the “Clarion liar”. I chuckled to myself as I thought his remark would not be reported in the Clarion-Ledger’s report of his speech. Of course, it was not in the newspaper’s story the next day.

Sen. Hyde-Smith hands Chris McDaniel a legitimate campaign gift

National debt is now over $21.1 trillion ($21,110,000,000,000) and rapidly growing

On May 17 the U.S. Senate rejected a resolution by Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky. The vote was 21-76, with three senators not voting, against Paul’s Concurrent Resolution 76 to provide spending cuts to the Fiscal Year 2019 budget and future budget levels for fiscal years 2000 to 2028. The vote has been call symbolic, meaningless, political and nothing less than a show vote. Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith of Mississippi called Paul’s measure a “theatric ” vote. Paul’s resolution was dubbed the “Penny Plan” because it called for a reduction of all federal spending by one percent over five years. Pro Hyde-Smith writers or anti-Chris McDaniel writers, one of Hyde Smith’s November opponents, quickly defended her vote. Actually, being pro-Hyde-Smith or anti-McDaniel are probably one in the same. Alan Lange’s Y’all Politics questioned whether the “Penny Plan” was the “real thing” or a “show vote.” Y’all Politics printed Hyde-Smith’s statement defending her vote.  Respected columnist Sid Salter wrote an even stronger response. Salter said Resolution 76 was more “political theatrics” than an “honest fiscal policy proposal.” I’ll agree the “Penny Plan” was a political vote under any circumstances. But since Sen. Hyde-Smith was appointed to replace Sen. Thad Cochran who retired for health reasons, she must now win a special election this November for the remainder of Cochran’s term. Apart from being a political vote, the bottom line is the “Penny Plan” was a vote to CUT federal spending.

Reducing federal spending is very important to Americans and future generations of Americans. The federal debt is now over $21.1 trillion dollars. That’s $21,110, 000,000,000 and climbing. For the current fiscal year, you and other American taxpayers, are estimated to pay total interest payments of $310 billion. These annual

Continue reading